This is the same as the win rate of a solid winning player! Despite the impact of the change in rake structure, low stakes poker players don’t seem to have noticed it as discussions on major poker forums have stayed out. With the new rake structure they would be winning around 9 big blinds/100 hands less than at the time when the old rake structure was still in use. The impact of this change on the win rate of NL10 players playing poker at Bodog is enormous. At these stakes the rake cap remains the same. Although the new structure is still very attractive for low stakes no-limit players (on average 4.1% rake is charged at 10nl with this rake structure) this still means that NL10 players on Bodog all of a sudden have to pay almost twice as much in rake.Īt mid to high stakes games the change in rake structure will have no influence on the amount of rake paid.

At NL10 the biggest difference with the old rake structure is a rake cap of $3 instead of $0.10.

This was a very low rake amount that made Bodog cheaper to play at for NL10 players than most other online poker rooms, even if they would be playing on a rakeback account somewhere else.īodog’s new rake structure is similar to that of PokerStars for no-limit games. The article shows precisely how much rake different online poker rooms charge at the micro stakes (up to NL25).Īccording to the article Bodog Poker only charged an average amount of rake of 2.1% with their old rake structure at NL10 games ($0.05/$0.10 blinds). Bodog did not come forth with an official statement about this change, but it was noticed in a review of rake and rakeback for micro stakes players on. Bodog recently changed the way in which it calculates how much rake to take from every pot in cash games where a flop has been dealt.

Bodog small stakes poker